Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Asajile Mwambulukutu
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Emmanuel Asajile Mwambulukutu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability asserted, no sourcing found Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 06:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 06:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 06:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 06:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. What does "no sourcing found" even mean when the article already has sources, and more can be easily found? Υπογράφω (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin, and articles should not just be listings of positions held.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep TPH you need to put a little more effort into your WP:BEFOREs. According to this source he at one point served as the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs, which, as a national office, fulfills WP:NPOL. Furthermore, this states he was a member of Parliament. Furthermore, this BBC article indicates that he held a position analogous to Ambassador to South Africa. -Indy beetle (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Deputy minister is a national office and termed "state minister" in many African countries. It meets WP:NPOL. High commissioner is the same as Ambassador in full sense. It is only used among Commonwealth nations. It meets WP:NPOL too. So the word "analogous" is not even needed here. Position that is "analogous" to Ambassador is called Chargé d'affaires; because the word "analogous" strips sense of fullness. A notable international diplomat. However, this nomination is not surprising if one considers nominations like this where entire country education is nominated for deletion by the same person.–Ammarpad (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, MP passes WP:NPOL easily. --Soman (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Well, no Snow Keep actually. Come on TenPoundHammer do the job properly, or don't do it at all, my friend. So, Tanzania's Ambassador to South Africa does not meet WP:NBIO? Just look at WP:NPOL - he clearly does. You first PROD-ed the article, stating "no sources", then you must have AFDed it still without checking the sources that were already there. Basic advice: a) look at the article (there were sources when you PRODed it); b) look on Google. c) read WP:BEFORE. Seriously, we're seeing some very poor AfDs and PRODs coming out from underneath that hammer of yours recently. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.