Jump to content

User:Mgkrupa/List of set identities and relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article lists mathematical properties and laws of sets, the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations.

The binary operations of set union () and intersection () satisfy many identities. Several of these identities or "laws" have well established names.


List of set identities and relations


Notation

[edit]

Throughout this article, capital letters such as and will denote sets and will denote the power set of If it is needed then unless indicated otherwise, it should be assumed that denotes the universe set, which means that all sets that used in the formula are subset of In particular, the complement of a set will be denoted by where unless indicated otherwise, it should be assumed that denotes the complement of in (the universe)

For sets and define:

The symmetric difference of and is:

and the complement of a set is:

    where is the universe set.

Algebra of sets

[edit]

A family of subsets of a set is said to be an algebra of sets if and for all all three of the sets and are elements of [1] The article on this topic lists set identities and other relationships these three operations.

Every algebra of sets is also a ring of sets[1] and a π-system.

Algebra generated by a family of sets

Given any family of subsets of there is a unique smallest[note 1] algebra of sets in containing [1] It is called the algebra generated by and we'll denote it by This algebra can be constructed as follows:[1]

  1. If then and we're done. Alternatively, if is empty then may be replaced with or and continue with the construction.
  2. Let be the family of all sets in together with their complements (taken in ).
  3. Let be the family of all possible finite intersections of sets in [note 2]
  4. Then the algebra generated by is the set consisting of all possible finite unions of sets in

Basic set relationships

[edit]

Assume that

Commutativity:
Associativity:
Distributivity:
Identity:
Complement:
Idempotent:
Domination:
Absorption laws:

Intersection can be expressed in terms of set difference :

Algebra of inclusion

[edit]

The following proposition says that the binary relation of inclusion is a partial order.

Reflexivity:
Antisymmetry:
  • and if and only if
Transitivity:
  • If and then

The following proposition says that for any set the power set of ordered by inclusion, is a bounded lattice, and hence together with the distributive and complement laws above, show that it is a Boolean algebra.

Existence of a least element and a greatest element:
Existence of joins:
  • If and then
Existence of meets:
  • If and then

The following are equivalent:

Some relationships involving complements

[edit]

Assume that

De Morgan's laws:
Double complement or involution law:
Complement laws for the universe set and the empty set:
Uniqueness of complements:
  • If and then
Algebra of relative complements
  • So if then
(by definition of this notation)

Intersection and unions of arbitrary families of sets

[edit]

Let be a families of sets.

  • In particular,
  • More generally, suppose that for each is some non-empty index set and for each is a set. Let be the set of all functions on such that for each (note that if all are equal to some set, call it then ). Then


Sets and maps

[edit]

Definitions

[edit]

Let be any function, where we denote its domain by and denote its codomain by

Many of the identities below do not actually require that the sets be somehow related to 's domain or codomain (i.e. to or ) so when some kind of relationship is necessary then it will be clearly indicated. Because of this, in this article, if S is declared to be "any set," and it is not indicated that must be somehow related to or (say for instance, that it be a subset or ) then it is meant that is truly arbitrary. So, for instance, it's even possible that or that and (which happens, for instance, if ), etc.

If S is any set then by definition,

f–1 (S) ≝ { x ∈ domain( f )  :  f (x) ∈ S }

and

f (S) ≝ { f (s) : sS ∩ domain( f ) }

Denote the image (or range) of which is the set by or

The restriction of a to denoted by is defined to be the map

with domain that is defined by sending to that is,

A set is said to be -saturated or simply saturated if which is only possible if

Throughout, will be a map, and

Finitely many sets

[edit]

Let be any function.

Let and be completely arbitrary sets. Assume and

Image Preimage Additional assumptions on sets
None
if and only if None
None
if and only if if and only if None
if and only if if and only if and
[note 3] None
None
None
if and only if there exists such that if and only if and
if and only if if and only if and
and are functions such that .

Also:

  • if and only if
  • When preimages preserve : If then if and only if
Image Preimage Additional assumptions on sets
implies implies None
[2] None

If is injective then equality holds.[3]

None

If is injective then equality holds.
If then equality holds.[note 4]
If is surjective then [note 5]

None

If is injective then equality holds.
None
Images of preimages and preimages of images

Let and be arbitrary sets, be any map, and let and .

Image of preimage Preimage of image Additional assumptions on sets
None

if and only if

None
[4]
None
None
None

If then equality holds.[5][6]
If and is surjective then equality holds.


If is injective then equality holds.[5][6]
If is -saturated then equality holds.

Infinitely many sets

[edit]
Images and preimages of unions and intersections

Images and preimages of unions are always preserved. Inverse images preserve both unions and intersections. It is only images of intersections that are not always preserved.

If is a family of arbitrary sets indexed by then:

If all are -saturated then be will be -saturated and equality will hold in the last relation below. Explicitly, this means:

     IF       for all   

If is a family of arbitrary subsets of which means that for all then this becomes:

     IF       for all   
Preimage from a Cartesian product

This subsection will describe the preimage of a subset under a map of the form For every

  • let denote the canonical projection onto and
  • let

so that which is also the unique map satisfying: for all The map should not be confused with the Cartesian product of these maps, which is the map

   defined by sending       to   

ObservationIf    and       then

If then equality will hold:

For equality to hold, it suffices for there to exist a family of subsets such that in which case:

and for all

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Here "smallest" means relative to subset containment. So if is any algebra of sets containing then
  2. ^ Since there is some such that its complement also belongs to The intersection of these two sets implies that The union of these two sets is equal to which implies that
  3. ^ The conclusion can also be written as:
  4. ^ Note that this condition depends entirely on and not on
  5. ^ can be rewritten as:

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference Encyclopedia of math was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Kelley 1985, p. 85
  3. ^ See Munkres 2000, p. 21
  4. ^ See p.388 of Lee, John M. (2010). Introduction to Topological Manifolds, 2nd Ed.
  5. ^ a b See Halmos 1960, p. 39
  6. ^ a b See Munkres 2000, p. 19

References

[edit]
[edit]