Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashtra times
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Rashtra times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find no evidence to support the notability of this publication. Claims of playing a "vital role" during the emergency (which emergency?) or of being "one of the most read weekly newspaper (sic) in Delhi" cannot be verified. Its website consists of a single static page with a telephone number for contact. There are no mentions of this publication in any other reliable source. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Although I accept that offline sources might exist for this, I cannot find anything that suggests this is likely. I can only find it mentioned in lists of newspapers. No citations to articles, no description of its history, no evidence of significant reporting... Moswento talky 11:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, also can't find reliable sources about this, other than a mention in a list of papers, and its editor being on a Press Club committee (here). I also tried searching for राष्ट्र टाइम्स, but don't read/speak Hindi, and didn't turn up anything. Someone who reads Hindi might find more about the newspaper. Agyle (talk) 19:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, weekly newspaper that has clearly been running for quite a while. I'm somewhat suprised by the claim that "There are no mentions of this publication in any other reliable source". Book references for being a Hindi weekly from Delhi includes http://books.google.com/books?id=SqkxAQAAIAAJ . http://books.google.se/books?id=SV7gAAAAMAAJ , p. 299, has circulation numbers, I can't read it well (text too small). http://books.google.com/books?id=NV_gAAAAMAAJ , p. 269 has a claimed circulation figure of 72,250. http://www.rni.nic.in/webreport.asp gives circulation as 72,600. And the Emergency refers to Emergency (India). --Soman (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Soman, while one-line mentions in lists of newspapers is a good indication that it exists, it falls short of the significant coverage by independent reliable sources required by WP:GNG. Agyle (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but if there are multiple refs indicating that it's a regular, weekly publications with a circulation in thousands, that can work. Notability criteria are subjective, and as per WP:GNG, if we have a stub saying that it's a) Hindi newspaper 2) weekly 3) published from Delhi, claimed a circulation of 72,600 in 2004, then that's covered per the references given. --Soman (talk) 05:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Soman, while one-line mentions in lists of newspapers is a good indication that it exists, it falls short of the significant coverage by independent reliable sources required by WP:GNG. Agyle (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Criteria are subjective, but can't be ignored; that is not "significant coverage". Agyle (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Non notable newspaper with no evidence of notability. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.